Exploring immigration, diasporic religious groups, and language across Canada.
CIECR
Portal, Report
January 2026
This multi-stage project seeks to investigate the relationships between immigration, language, culture, and "diaspora churches" in Canada. In this project, we seek to better understand some of the cultural, linguistic, and religious dynamics of diaspora churches across the country, which will better inform our understanding of these churches or places of worship.
TBA
This typology classifies congregations according to the cultural, linguistic, ethnic, ancestral, and country-of-origin composition of their active participants or members. It is designed to identify meaningful patterns of congregational composition while avoiding over-classification based on very small numbers, single-family clusters, or assumed identity.
For the purposes of this typology, congregational cultural identity may be identified through a combination of country of origin, ethnicity, language, ancestry, and retained cultural practice. These dimensions are treated as flexible descriptive fields rather than mutually exclusive categories.
In some cases, a congregational group may be defined primarily by shared country of origin, such as a Ghanaian, Korean, or Nigerian congregation. In other cases, the most meaningful category may be language, such as an Arabic-speaking group drawn from several countries. In still other cases, cultural identity may be more specific than nationality, such as tribal, regional, ethnic, or people-group identities within a national origin group.
Each enumerated group should therefore be coded according to whether it is defined by one or more of the following:
This approach allows the typology to capture the way identity is actually organized within congregational life, while still maintaining consistent criteria for enumeration.
This typology does not assume that cultural identity is equivalent to immigrant status, nor does it treat Canadian-born participants as lacking cultural identity. Rather, it identifies congregational identity groups where there is a concrete and observable link to country of origin, language, ancestry, ethnicity, or retained cultural practice.
These links may be present among first-generation immigrants, later-generation descendants, or Canadian-born participants who continue to identify with or participate in a shared cultural, linguistic, ethnic, or ancestral community.
A congregation may therefore be shaped by a recent immigrant community, by a long-established diaspora community, or by Canadian-born members who continue to participate in a shared cultural or linguistic tradition. For this reason, cultural identity should not be used as a proxy for immigration status.
Where relevant, immigration generation may be coded separately, for example:
The goal is not to profile individuals, but to describe patterns of congregational composition where those patterns are relevant to congregational identity, ministry context, language use, community networks, or cultural practice. An enumerated cultural or culture-like group should therefore have a concrete link to country of origin, language, ancestry, ethnicity, or retained cultural practice, rather than being based only on perceived appearance or assumed background.
A cultural or culture-like identity group is formally counted only if it meets both of the following conditions:
This avoids treating a single large household or extended family as a broader cultural constituency within the congregation.